Pytanie  |
Odpowiedź |
What is an Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flight? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A flight conducted in accordance with the Instrument Flight Rules.
|
|
|
What is an instrument approach procedure (IAP)? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A published series of predetermined manoeuvres providing obstacle protection from the initial approach to landing or missed approach.
|
|
|
What are the main segments of an instrument approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Initial, intermediate, final and missed approach.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Initial Approach Fix: the fix where the initial approach segment begins.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Intermediate Fix: the fix associated with the start of the intermediate approach segment.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Final Approach Fix: the fix from which the final approach segment of many 2D procedures begins.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Final Approach Point: the point where the nominal vertical path of a 3D approach is intercepted.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Missed Approach Point: the point at or before which the prescribed missed approach is initiated when required.
|
|
|
Are FAF and MAPt necessarily at the same location? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. They define different points within the approach procedure.
|
|
|
What is the purpose of the initial approach segment? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To position the aircraft for the intermediate segment with required obstacle clearance.
|
|
|
What is the purpose of the intermediate approach segment? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To align and configure the aircraft for the final approach.
|
|
|
What is the purpose of the final approach segment? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To provide the path from the FAF/FAP toward landing or the MAPt.
|
|
|
What is the purpose of the missed approach procedure? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To provide obstacle-protected transition from the approach to a safe altitude or holding point.
|
|
|
What is a straight-in approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
An instrument approach followed by landing on a runway aligned with the final approach course.
|
|
|
What is a circling approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
An instrument approach followed by visual manoeuvring to a runway not suitable for straight-in landing.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A published IFR departure route linking a runway or aerodrome to the en-route structure.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A published IFR arrival route linking the en-route structure with an approach procedure.
|
|
|
Why are SID and STAR restrictions operationally important? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
They provide traffic sequencing, terrain clearance and predictable flight paths.
|
|
|
Does ATC clearance automatically cancel published SID/STAR restrictions? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. Restrictions remain unless explicitly cancelled, replaced or otherwise specified.
|
|
|
What is an altitude constraint? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A published or cleared altitude that must be met at a specified point.
|
|
|
What does “at or above” mean on an altitude constraint? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The aircraft must cross the fix at no lower than the stated altitude.
|
|
|
What does “at or below” mean? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The aircraft must cross the fix at no higher than the stated altitude.
|
|
|
What does an altitude window mean? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The aircraft must cross between the published upper and lower limits.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Minimum Sector Altitude: an emergency-use altitude providing at least 1,000 ft obstacle clearance in a defined area.
|
|
|
What radius is normally associated with an MSA? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
25 NM from the specified navigation reference, unless otherwise stated.
|
|
|
Does MSA necessarily guarantee navigation signal coverage? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. Its primary purpose is obstacle clearance.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Terminal Arrival Altitude: an obstacle-clearance altitude facilitating direct arrival to an RNAV approach.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Minimum En-route Altitude: the lowest published en-route altitude providing required obstacle clearance and navigation coverage.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Obstacle Clearance Altitude: the lowest altitude used in establishing compliance with obstacle-clearance criteria.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Obstacle Clearance Height: OCA expressed as a height above the relevant reference datum.
|
|
|
Is OCA/H itself necessarily the operational minimum used by the crew? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. Operational DA/H or MDA/H cannot normally be lower than the applicable OCA/H.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Decision Altitude: an altitude at which a missed approach must be initiated if required visual reference is not established.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Decision Height: the corresponding height above the specified reference datum.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Minimum Descent Altitude: an altitude below which descent is not permitted without required visual reference.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Minimum Descent Height: MDA expressed as a height above the specified datum.
|
|
|
What is the key operational difference between DA and MDA? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
DA is a decision point passed dynamically; MDA is traditionally an altitude not to be descended below.
|
|
|
Under current EASA methodology, what minima are used for a 3D approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
Under current EASA methodology, what minima are used for a 2D approach flown using CDFA? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
DA/H derived from the applicable procedure minima.
|
|
|
What minima are used for a 2D approach not flown using CDFA? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What is a 2D instrument approach operation? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
An approach using lateral navigation guidance only.
|
|
|
What is a 3D instrument approach operation? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
An approach using both lateral and vertical navigation guidance.
|
|
|
What is a Type A instrument approach operation? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
An instrument approach with DH or MDH at or above 250 ft.
|
|
|
What is a Type B instrument approach operation? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
An instrument approach with DH below 250 ft.
|
|
|
How is Type B subdivided under current EASA terminology? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
CAT I, CAT II and CAT III.
|
|
|
What defines CAT I in the EASA classification? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
DH ≥200 ft and either VIS ≥800 m or RVR ≥550 m.
|
|
|
What defines CAT II in the EASA classification? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
100 ft ≤ DH <200 ft and RVR ≥300 m.
|
|
|
What defines CAT III in the current EASA classification? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
DH <100 ft or no DH, with RVR <300 m or no RVR limitation.
|
|
|
Does current EASA operational classification still divide CAT III into IIIA, IIIB and IIIC? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. Current EASA uses CAT III as one category.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Continuous Descent Final Approach: a continuous descent technique for flying the final segment of a 2D/NPA procedure.
|
|
|
What is the principal objective of CDFA? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To avoid level flight near minima and provide a stable, constant descent path.
|
|
|
Why is CDFA safer than the traditional dive-and-drive technique? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
It reduces level-offs, configuration changes and CFIT risk close to the ground.
|
|
|
Under EASA CAT operations, should NPA procedures normally be flown using CDFA? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Yes, unless another technique has been specifically approved.
|
|
|
From where is CDFA normally initiated? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
At or above the FAF altitude/height on the nominal final descent profile.
|
|
|
For a straight-in CDFA, where does the continuous descent concept extend to? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Approximately 50 ft above the threshold or the start of the flare.
|
|
|
Does CDFA change the obstacle-protected design of the published procedure? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. It is a flight technique applied to the published procedure.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A fix permitting descent to a lower minimum altitude after it has been positively identified.
|
|
|
Can a step-down altitude be ignored because the FMS shows a smooth vertical path? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. Published altitude restrictions remain controlling.
|
|
|
What is a stabilised approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
An approach meeting the operator’s defined criteria for path, speed, configuration, thrust and rate of descent.
|
|
|
Are exact stabilised-approach criteria universal? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. The operator defines them in the Operations Manual.
|
|
|
What does EASA require generally regarding approach technique? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Approach operations should be flown as stabilised approaches unless specifically approved otherwise.
|
|
|
Why should a high expected rate of descent be briefed? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
It increases workload and may threaten stabilised-approach criteria.
|
|
|
What rate of descent does EASA specifically highlight for prior briefing? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What is the approximate vertical gradient of a 3° glide path? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
How many feet per NM does a 3° path represent? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Approximately 318 ft/NM; 300 ft/NM is a useful mental approximation.
|
|
|
What is the quick rule for vertical speed on a 3° path? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Groundspeed × 5 gives an approximate rate of descent in ft/min.
|
|
|
At 120 kt GS, what is approximately required for a 3° path? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
At 150 kt GS, what is approximately required for a 3° path? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
At 180 kt GS, what is approximately required for a 3° path? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What happens to required vertical speed if groundspeed increases? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
It increases proportionally for the same flight-path angle.
|
|
|
Why can a strong tailwind make an approach difficult to regain vertically? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
High groundspeed gives less time per NM to lose altitude.
|
|
|
What is the 3:1 descent-planning rule? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
About 3 NM are required for every 1,000 ft of descent on roughly a 3° path.
|
|
|
Approximately how far is required to lose 3,000 ft on a 3° path? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What is the difference between descent angle and descent gradient? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Angle is measured in degrees; gradient is vertical distance divided by horizontal distance.
|
|
|
What is a 5.2% gradient approximately in degrees? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What is the standard ICAO missed-approach design climb gradient? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
2.5%, unless a higher gradient is published.
|
|
|
If a higher missed-approach gradient is required, where should it be found? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
On the published instrument approach chart.
|
|
|
What should a crew confirm when higher missed-approach gradients are published? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
That aircraft performance can meet the required gradient under expected conditions.
|
|
|
When does obstacle protection for the published missed approach assume the turn begins? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Not before the published turning point or applicable procedure point.
|
|
|
Why can an early turn during a missed approach be hazardous? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
It may take the aircraft outside the protected obstacle-clearance area.
|
|
|
When should the missed approach be flown? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Whenever required visual reference is not obtained, the approach becomes unstable, or continuation is unsafe.
|
|
|
If visual reference is lost after descending below minima, what is required? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
Does initiating a go-around mean immediately turning toward the next missed-approach fix? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Not necessarily; first follow the published missed-approach track and turn constraints.
|
|
|
Why must the missed approach be briefed before commencing the approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
It is a high-workload manoeuvre that may be required with little warning.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A restriction on continuing an approach when reported visibility or controlling RVR is below the applicable minimum.
|
|
|
Under EASA CAT rules, does reported RVR/VIS below minima itself prohibit beginning the approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. The regulatory restriction concerns continuation beyond the specified point.
|
|
|
If controlling RVR/VIS is below minima, below what point may an EASA CAT approach not normally continue? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Past 1,000 ft above aerodrome elevation.
|
|
|
What applies when DH or MDH is above 1,000 ft above aerodrome elevation? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The approach may not continue into the final approach segment when RVR/VIS is below minima.
|
|
|
What if RVR/VIS deteriorates below minima after passing the approach-ban point? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The approach may continue to DA/H or MDA/H, subject to the applicable rules.
|
|
|
What is normally the controlling RVR for an aeroplane approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
If touchdown-zone RVR is not reported, what may become controlling under EASA AMC? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What must exist at DA/H to continue below it when visual reference is required? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The required visual reference for the intended operation and runway.
|
|
|
Must required visual reference merely appear momentarily at minima? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. It must be established and maintained for continued landing.
|
|
|
What is the basic decision at DA/H? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
If required visual reference is not established, execute the missed approach.
|
|
|
Can the aircraft physically descend slightly below DA during a go-around initiated at DA? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Yes. DA is a decision point; aircraft inertia means some altitude loss may occur during transition.
|
|
|
Why is an MDA concept different from DA? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
MDA is a hard altitude floor in non-CDFA operation and must not be descended below without visual reference.
|
|
|
|
rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A visual manoeuvre after an instrument approach to position for landing on a different or insufficiently aligned runway.
|
|
|
Is circling an instrument or visual manoeuvre? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The circling phase is visual, although it follows an instrument approach.
|
|
|
What must be maintained during circling? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Required visual reference with the runway environment while remaining within the protected area.
|
|
|
What should be done if visual reference is lost during circling? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Execute the prescribed circling missed-approach procedure.
|
|
|
Why are circling minima normally higher than straight-in minima? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Additional obstacle clearance is required during visual manoeuvring around the aerodrome.
|
|
|
What determines the applicable circling aircraft category? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Aircraft approach speed category and the speed actually required for the manoeuvre.
|
|
|
What is category A by VAT? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What is category B by VAT? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What is category C by VAT? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What is category D by VAT? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What is category E by VAT? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
If circling speed exceeds the limit of the normal aircraft category, what should be considered? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Use of the minima/protection for the appropriate higher category.
|
|
|
Why does circling speed affect protected-area size? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Higher speed produces a larger turn radius.
|
|
|
What is a holding pattern? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A predetermined manoeuvre keeping an aircraft within specified airspace while awaiting further clearance.
|
|
|
What are the two basic legs of a conventional hold? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Inbound and outbound legs connected by 180° turns.
|
|
|
What is a standard holding pattern? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A hold with right turns unless otherwise published or instructed.
|
|
|
What is a non-standard holding pattern? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
What are the three conventional holding entries? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Direct, parallel and offset/teardrop.
|
|
|
Are holding-entry sectors absolute manoeuvring requirements? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
They are recommended entry methods; safe containment and operator procedures remain controlling.
|
|
|
What is the purpose of wind correction in a hold? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To maintain the protected holding pattern and correct inbound track.
|
|
|
On which leg is holding timing primarily adjusted? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The outbound leg, to achieve the required inbound timing.
|
|
|
What is the usual inbound holding time at or below FL140? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
1 minute unless otherwise published.
|
|
|
What is the usual inbound holding time above FL140? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
1.5 minutes unless otherwise published.
|
|
|
If a hold is defined by DME distances, what controls the outbound limit? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The published DME distance rather than timing.
|
|
|
What must always take priority over generic holding-speed memory values? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The speed published on the chart, ATC restriction and applicable aircraft/operator limits.
|
|
|
Why is holding at high TAS operationally important? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Higher TAS increases turn radius and the airspace required.
|
|
|
What happens to turn radius in a hold as TAS increases? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
Why may bank or turn-rate limits matter in holding? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
They determine whether the aircraft remains within expected protected geometry.
|
|
|
What is the protected side of a hold? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
The side containing the holding pattern and the main obstacle-protected area.
|
|
|
Why should an aircraft avoid unnecessary excursions onto the non-holding side? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Obstacle-protection margins are smaller there.
|
|
|
What is procedure turn or course reversal designed to achieve? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To reverse direction and establish the aircraft inbound on the final/intermediate approach course.
|
|
|
Can every published approach use any course-reversal technique? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. The chart and procedure coding define the authorised manoeuvre.
|
|
|
What is a racetrack procedure? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A course-reversal procedure resembling a holding pattern used to establish the aircraft inbound.
|
|
|
What is a base turn procedure? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A specified outbound track followed by a turn to intercept the inbound track.
|
|
|
What does “NoPT” or equivalent procedure indication mean conceptually? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A procedure turn or course reversal is not required from that arrival route.
|
|
|
Why should pilots not improvise course reversals? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Obstacle protection assumes the published procedure geometry.
|
|
|
What is an ATC radar vector to final intended to achieve? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Position the aircraft to intercept the final approach course safely.
|
|
|
Does an ATC vector remove the crew’s responsibility for altitude awareness? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
Why should minimum cleared altitude and terrain be continuously monitored under vectors? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Vectoring does not remove CFIT risk.
|
|
|
What is the purpose of an approach briefing? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To build a shared mental model of the approach, threats, minima and missed approach.
|
|
|
What are essential elements of an approach briefing? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Procedure, runway, minima, navigation setup, key constraints, threats and missed approach.
|
|
|
Why should the missed approach altitude be checked carefully? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A wrongly set altitude can create an immediate vertical-path or ATC conflict during go-around.
|
|
|
Why should approach minima be independently cross-checked? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Minima errors can directly compromise terrain clearance and landing legality.
|
|
|
Why should final approach course and runway heading be compared? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
A significant difference may indicate an offset approach or wrong procedure/runway selection.
|
|
|
Why should approach navigation sources be identified before final approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Correct source selection and monitoring are essential for valid guidance.
|
|
|
What is the operational significance of a published minimum temperature on an LNAV/VNAV approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Baro-VNAV vertical guidance may not be authorised below it without approved compensation.
|
|
|
Can an advisory FMS vertical path convert an LNAV approach into a 3D approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
No. The published approach type and approved guidance determine the operation.
|
|
|
Does a synthetic or advisory glide path change published LNAV minima? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
|
|
|
Why must published altitude constraints still be respected when using VNAV? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
VNAV guidance does not supersede procedure obstacle-clearance restrictions.
|
|
|
What is the main threat of descending early below a published segment altitude? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Loss of guaranteed obstacle clearance.
|
|
|
What is the main threat of remaining high until very late in the approach? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
An unstable approach requiring excessive descent rate or configuration changes.
|
|
|
What is the preferred response to an approach that cannot be stabilised? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
Go around rather than attempt to salvage it close to the ground.
|
|
|
What is the fundamental purpose of IFR procedural discipline? rozpocznij naukę
|
|
To keep the aircraft inside the obstacle-protected and traffic-managed flight path.
|
|
|
